ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP issues

2007-06-05 12:05:48
Steve Atkins wrote:

I think that deploying a new RR isn't as trivial as has been claimed, but having TXT and something else just won't work well.

Steve,

I see your point and concern.

If the WG is wanting a new RR, then my vote for a RR/TXT lookup order was just the most logical strategy, IMO.

On the other hand, the TXT record can contain an NEWRR=1 attribute that tells the client that the same info is available via an RR lookup, if its reliable for the client to use. In this case, it would a TXT lookup first time concept.

I don't see that as a problem.

But again, my vote was only if the WG was moving towards a new RR idea. Which I think it should as a long term stategy.

--
Sincerely

Hector Santos, CTO
http://www.santronics.com
http://santronics.blogspot.com

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>