-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Jun 7, 2007, at 8:09 AM, Damon wrote:
No, this doesn't change the semantics of DKIM-BASE. The DKIM-Base
"ignore failures" philosophy is basically "an invalid signature is
exactly the same as no signature at all: no better and no
worse." What
we're talking about is how the missing/invalid signature case is
handled.
-Jim
The document already covers this case. It assumes that anyone doing so
must be a bad actor. Says nothing about good players doing it on
purpose :-)
Yes, sorta....
If I have a valid public key for which there is no private key, it's
not malformed. As a matter of fact, you can't tell that I burned the
private key.
It's perfectly well-formed, it's just incapable of executing
successfully.
Jon
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Universal 2.6.1
Charset: US-ASCII
wj8DBQFGaRr7sTedWZOD3gYRAtuuAKCPgv1Ex+GWxJoBvrXOKcESFYbUBQCgkwEA
x/Z9UQa7oUCvXkO74bWOFa8=
=1FeS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html