ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues

2007-06-08 06:32:22
Hector Santos:
       I don't expect mail from this domain - kill it, don't
       tag it or mark it as bad for user's to see, kill it,
       don't pass it on. Its not ours!  - If you do, it is
       no longer our responsibility as DKIM-BASE suggest it
       is."

Enough is enough.

I thought we already debunked the myth that SSP can tell receivers
what they should do.

It's a sender signing policy. It's not a receiver disposition policy.
       ====== =======                    ======== ===========

Sender != Receiver

Signing != Disposition

I am of course assuming that this forum is conducting business in
plain English, not some variant with radically different semantics.
If my assumption is in error, please ignore this erroneous comment.

        Wietse
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>