ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues

2007-06-06 23:08:42
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On Jun 6, 2007, at 2:55 PM, Steve Atkins wrote:


Yup. I think everyone (mostly) understands this. The entertainment
arrives when you want to be able to have a single policy record
refer to a large number of subdomains via wildcard.

I get the distinct impression people don't understand. I'm pretty  
sure I don't, and among the things I don't understand is your use of  
"NO ENCRYPTED MAIL.' Encryption is completely not in scope of this  
working group. Even if I figure you've just made a braino, I'm confused.

However, that leads into what I think is a valuable point.

We want to have a way to make a policy statement S, apply to a range  
of subdomains, through some sort of wildcarding. I don't see anything  
that says:

For a given policy statement S that you want to apply to domain range  
D, issue a query that looks like Q.

I think it would help to describe it in broad terms rather than worry  
about the details at present.

        Jon


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Universal 2.6.1
Charset: US-ASCII

wj8DBQFGZ6ACsTedWZOD3gYRAsaKAJ0dpMj7u9mTqYpFcOSz7KjhO3bd4ACfTf8t
p5fQSpSBdGqi2cyRsPIr9aY=
=123m
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html