Re: [ietf-dkim] Zone Files
2007-06-08 10:25:33
On Fri, 8 Jun 2007, Hector Santos wrote:
Charles Lindsey wrote:
Why not?
So you are expecting Nominet (the managers of the uk TLD, and of co.uk,
org.uk, net.uk, etc under it) to administer the '_ssp.uk' domain on behalf
of Demon and all the 99999 other *.co.uk domains that have been registered
by the umpteen registrars licensed by Nominet?
No. I was ignorant of ccTLDs. No longer. :-) I've done the research. Now I am
studying how the gTLD root server are related to the ccTLD root servers.
The only way your scheme could possibly work is by invoking some Magic that
tells you to look at sales._ssp.demon.co.uk, so that Demon get to manage
their own policies. The only possible such Magic suggested so far is Doug
Otis's global registry of registrable domains, or maybe some inventive
examination of SOA records.
Right. I don't see a reason why the protocol can not implement a gTLD, ccTLD
name space logic in order to find the level where the domain ownership
begins.
The protocol can include these in a name space and instantly determine where
the domain ownership begins.
The closest thing you can do is talk gTLD and ccTLD into putting some
record at _xyz.TLD that tells root level of deligation for that TLD.
Unfortunetly cases like .US make it worth since there are multiple
deligation roots.
I don't see a problem programming for this. Par for the course.
You haven't done it. I have - large database that is hard to maintain.
Here is one for well-known domain for example (which does both 2nd
and 3rd level deligation):
DoWhois_MainDomains(Buffer, Query, "whois.cira.ca", "", 6, "SUBDOMAIN:",
"on.ca, qc.ca, nl.ca, pe.ca, nt.ca, nu.ca, bc.ca, ab.ca, nb.ca, ns.ca,
yk.ca, sk.ca, mb.ca", querylevel);
Here is another less well-known:
DoWhois_MainDomains(Buffer, Query, "whois.nic.hu", "", 13, "DOMAIN:",
"co.hu, 2000.hu, erotika.hu, jogasz.hu, sex.hu, video.hu, info.hu, agrar.hu,
film.hu, konyvelo.hu, shop.hu, org.hu, bolt.hu, forum.hu, lakas.hu, suli.hu,
priv.hu, casino.hu, games.hu, media.hu, szex.hu, sport.hu, city.hu, hotel.hu,
news.hu, tozsde.hu, tm.hu, erotica.hu, ingatlan.hu, reklam.hu, utazas.hu",
querylevel);
It goes like this for almost every large-enough TLD (for others I often
simply don't know).
--
William Leibzon
Elan Networks
william(_at_)elan(_dot_)net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues, (continued)
- Re: MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues, Steve Atkins
- [ietf-dkim] Zone Files, Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Zone Files, Charles Lindsey
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Zone Files, Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Zone Files,
william(at)elan.net <=
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Zone Files, Steve Atkins
- Re: MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues, Hector Santos
- Re: MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues, Jim Fenton
- Re: MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues, Hector Santos
- Re: MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues, SM
- Re: MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues, Douglas Otis
- Re: MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues, Jon Callas
- Re: MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues, Damon
- Re: MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues, Jim Fenton
- Re: MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues, Hector Santos
|
|
|