Re: [ietf-dkim] list mail again, was suspicious and SUSPICIOUS

ietf-dkim

Re: [ietf-dkim] list mail again, was suspicious and SUSPICIOUS

2007-10-02 10:59:22

On Tuesday 02 October 2007 12:44, John Levine wrote:

   b) was it sent to the mailing list by the purported "From"?"

Why would anyone care about b?


Well, as an example, a message saying: ...
would have a very different meaning coming from me than from Jim Fenton.
Who is saying something is quite often relevant.


How is it relevant to DKIM or SSP?  For filtering purposes, if a
message is from the list, it's from the list.

True, but the question was why would anyone care.  That was an example of why 
someone would care.

Scott K
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [ietf-dkim] Conflicts between -ssp-requirements and -ssp, Charles Lindsey Re: [ietf-dkim] Conflicts between -ssp-requirements and -ssp, Graham Murray [ietf-dkim] suspicious and SUSPICIOUS, Michael Thomas Re: [ietf-dkim] suspicious and SUSPICIOUS, Douglas Otis Re: [ietf-dkim] suspicious and SUSPICIOUS, Charles Lindsey RE: [ietf-dkim] suspicious and SUSPICIOUS, Bill.Oxley Re: [ietf-dkim] suspicious and SUSPICIOUS, Scott Kitterman Re: [ietf-dkim] list mail again, was suspicious and SUSPICIOUS, John Levine Re: [ietf-dkim] list mail again, was suspicious and SUSPICIOUS, Scott Kitterman <= Re: [ietf-dkim] suspicious and SUSPICIOUS, Douglas Otis Re: [ietf-dkim] suspicious and SUSPICIOUS, Charles Lindsey RE: [ietf-dkim] suspicious and SUSPICIOUS, Bill.Oxley Re: [ietf-dkim] suspicious and SUSPICIOUS, Charles Lindsey RE: [ietf-dkim] suspicious and SUSPICIOUS, Bill.Oxley Re: [ietf-dkim] yet more of the usual list nonsense, was suspicious, John Levine Re: [ietf-dkim] yet more of the usual list nonsense, was suspicious, Douglas Otis Re: [ietf-dkim] yet more of the usual list nonsense, was suspicious, Charles Lindsey Re: [ietf-dkim] the usual list nonsense, was suspicious and SUSPICIOUS, John Levine Re: [ietf-dkim] suspicious and SUSPICIOUS, Jim Fenton

Previous by Date:	Re: [ietf-dkim] list mail again, was suspicious and SUSPICIOUS, John Levine
Next by Date:	Re: [ietf-dkim] suspicious and SUSPICIOUS, Douglas Otis
Previous by Thread:	Re: [ietf-dkim] list mail again, was suspicious and SUSPICIOUS, John Levine
Next by Thread:	Re: [ietf-dkim] suspicious and SUSPICIOUS, Douglas Otis
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]