I am happy to say that DKIM MUST support the use of ARF as A reporting format
I disagree that it should be the only reporting format supported. What we want
today and what we will want in five years time are going to be different. ARF
is a decent start but its limited. To go much further it is going to be
necessary to use structured data.
-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
[mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Damon
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 10:44 PM
To: O'Reirdan, Michael
Cc: ietf-dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal to amend SSP draft with a
reportingaddress(fwd)
+1
I believe that I was the one that asked for the feedback
loop a long time ago.
I like the ARF format.
Not really concerned about it being abused. I have far worse
in the postmaster box just as it is. It is just another tool to help.
Regards,
Damon Sauer
On Nov 10, 2007 1:38 PM, O'Reirdan, Michael
<Michael_OReirdan(_at_)cable(_dot_)comcast(_dot_)com> wrote:
I agree. It would be a massive hassle for us to have to do
something else.
Mike O'Reirdan
________________________________
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org on behalf of John Levine
Sent: Sat 11/10/2007 12:23 AM
To: ietf-dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal to amend SSP draft with a
reporting
address(fwd)
I gather that AOL has something where you (a sender) can
sign up to
receive an ARF feed of stuff you are sending that is
generating spam
reports. It's probably a good guess that this or
something close to
it is what the big guys are using to share information between
themselves. (Honestly, I don't know for sure if this is
what they do
use, but I assume so.)
AOL, Hotmail, and Earthlink all have feedback loops that
return mail
reported as spam in ARF format. Works great. (Nothing
secret about
this, by the way.)
Largely as an experiment, I've been sending all my spam
reports in ARF
for the past year or so. Other than the occasional ISP who
still is
afraid to open attachments, they've been accepted very well, even
without any prearrangement with the recipients.
If you're going to send back reports about messages, via SSP or
otherwise, it'd be nuts to use any format other than ARF.
You might
want to add another couple of items to the report info, but ARF is
designed to be easily extensible.
R's,
John
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html