Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
I am happy to say that DKIM MUST support the use of ARF as A reporting format
I disagree that it should be the only reporting format supported. What we
want today and what we will want in five years time are going to be
different. ARF is a decent start but its limited. To go much further it is
going to be necessary to use structured data.
Ok, but let's proceed cautiously here, Phillip. This is an area where
more standards != better. How would you propose we manage interoperability?
Eliot
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html