On Tue, 04 Dec 2007 15:30:27 -0800 Dave Crocker <dhc(_at_)dcrocker(_dot_)net>
wrote:
Jim Fenton wrote:
In the absence of a valid DKIM signature on behalf of the "From" address
[RFC2822], the verifier of a message MUST determine whether messages
from a
particular sender are expected to be signed, and what signatures are
acceptable.
What's proving interesting is how completely the implication of this seems
to
have been missed by quite a few participants.
I seem to have missed the discussion where anyone but you is suprised by
this. If one is going to distinguish between originator signatures and
others, then this requirement pretty obviously follows.
Scott K
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html