On Wednesday 05 December 2007 13:09, Dave Crocker wrote:
Folks,
If non-participants are to be asked about the potential use of SSP, it
helps to have a description of it that is concise, complete and for which
there is reasonable consensus about the content. Simply handing
non-participants a point to the specification is useless for all but the
most technical and dedicated.
Since you've already stated you think SSP is useless, please don't muddy the
waters with writing more stuff for us to review that serves no purpose other
than disctraction.
Let's focus on getting the spec done and sweat the marketing later.
Scott K
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html