John Levine wrote:
I know you didn't ask me this, but (sorry), if we decide to change
"Suspicious" to something else then we might as well go fully P.C. and
change it to "a message of interest."
How about changing it to something descriptive like "not SSP
validated"? That's what it is, after all.
We're much better off describing what the software does rather than
implying what we the recipient might think about it.
Seems a little circular to me. "not SSP validated" might also be
interpreted as, "we haven't applied SSP to this message", even though we
know that SSP doesn't really "validate" messages at all.
-Jim
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html