ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Issue #1513, (was: Re: [ietf-dkim] Draft summary of SSP functionality)

2007-12-06 12:59:04

Dave Crocker wrote:

You think it is argumentative that, for example, a protocol element
that directs a recipient to Reject mail will typically be adhered
to and that conforming to SSP but not adhering to that explicit
request is unlikely?

This seems to be a discussion of issue 1513 [1], in fact
raised by Mike, and where the two of you may in fact agree (while
doing a great job of appearing to disagree:-)

Stephen.

[1] https://rt.psg.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1513

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html