Michael Thomas wrote:
To use your example, where 5 declares spam, why is the configuration
likely to set STRICT to 4 rather than 10 or 100, given the semantics
of Strict?
Why does this matter? It's an implementation detail. You only asked
whether people would use SSP that way. The answer is a resounding yes.
What an interesting perspective. The degree of weight that gets used for this
feature is merely an implementation detail, rather than a fundamental test of
the mechanism's utility.
For reference I asked a different question than you chose to hear, but I think
we have sufficiently demonstrated that this exchange cannot be productive.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html