How about changing it to something descriptive like "not SSP
validated"? That's what it is, after all.
We're much better off describing what the software does rather than
implying what we the recipient might think about it.
I think that's fine. This issue isn't a show-stopper in my opinion.
Arvel
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html