John Levine wrote:
I know you didn't ask me this, but (sorry), if we decide to change
"Suspicious" to something else then we might as well go fully P.C. and
change it to "a message of interest."
How about changing it to something descriptive like "not SSP
validated"? That's what it is, after all.
We're much better off describing what the software does rather than
implying what we the recipient might think about it.
or better is unknown, strict/fail, all/fail. _what_ practice didn't
pass muster is useful since they aren't all saying the same thing.
I think this also related to issue 1513 I raised.
Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html