On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 16:12:05 -0800 Steve Atkins <steve(_at_)blighty(_dot_)com>
wrote:
On Dec 6, 2007, at 4:08 PM, Frank Ellermann wrote:
Steve Atkins wrote:
part of the push to try and build a next generation SPF
No push in that direction on any SPF or IETF list I know,
in fact discussing 2822 originator header fields on SPF
lists would be on the border to "off topic" (excl. PRA
for various and known reasons).
A "part of the push" sounds like more than one or two
contributors, are you talking about Doug's TBR draft ?
That's IMO no SPF-TNG, it might be a kind of SMTP-TNG.
I was referring to SSP, which is trying to be the next SPF
(and, in strict mode, is identical in functionality to a subset of
SPF).
What subset of SPF is that? I'm intimately familiar with SPF and I'm not
following you.
Scott K
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html