I'm sympathetic to this perspective. I think we have two broad
groups here. One believes that SSP has utility and one believes that
it doesn't.
I wouldn't object to a version of SSP that stuck to publishing
senders' practices, and I doubt anyone else would either.
Unfortunately, the current draft is about 1/4 sender practices and 3/4
other stuff. It's the other stuff that's the problem.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html