ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Accidental versus malicous error

2007-12-20 16:23:02
A mailing-list not breaking signatures is a scary idea.  This would
open the door for all sorts of abuse.

Yesterday, of the 32082 messages that Cisco sent through mailing lists,
99.6% of them passed verification. Keep your grubby mitts off of the
supposedly broken signatures like RFC4871 says.

      Mike

Exactly,

 So why again are we demoting broken signatures to No Signature? This
promotes ALL to STRICT.

Regards,
Damon Sauer
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html