Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: protecting a domain name vs. protecting a dom

> Dave, I'm not understanding how the algorithm can work if you omit 
> step 2 from section 4.2.2.
It can't.

> Without step 2 there is nothing example.com can do to protect its
> name space.
Right again.

It would be a large mistake to remove step 2.

Arvel


_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html