Sorry, I'm asking John Levine this question (not Jim).
Arvel Hathcock wrote:
Let's not be too gentle here; failure to do this results in a very
misleading result from ADSP. I would make it at least a SHOULD.
So, I want to understand.
You are proposing that we NOT eradicate all mention of an NXDOMAIN check
but that we move it from a required algorithmic step and into language
which is non-compulsory. Is this correct?
Arvel
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html