John L wrote:
That would be fine with me, but what it says now is that the i= MUST match
the From: address. As I've said a few times, that's clearly wrong, but I
got shouted down in the past when I tried to change it.
Without getting into the merits of the argument (and I don't think we
should do all that again), the document does currently reflect the
WG's rough consensus so let's keep this to adding clarifications as
Pasi requested and not try re-open issues now after the end of IETF
LC.
Stephen.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html