(d). My suggested changes to Eliot's proposal are at
http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim/2009q1/011153.html
-Jim
Stephen Farrell wrote:
Hi All,
We've had some recent discussion about d=/i= on the list
and a couple of concrete proposals for clarifications to
make to RFC 4871.
- The first is Dave's erratum I-D. [1]
- The second is a proposal from Eliot.[2]
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html