ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus call on d=/i= clarification

2009-02-17 01:57:15
Wietse Venema wrote:
Stephen Farrell:
(a) The erratum I-D [1] is ready to go. Process it.

Motivation:

Adding tweaks to a confusing document does not remove the confusion
(you can consider this my variant of Brooks's law).

Confusion is removed by stating clear terms up-front, and by casting
the discussion into those terms.

Its called Focused Confusion.

-- 
Sincerely

Hector Santos
http://www.santronics.com


_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html