Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus call on d=/i= clarification

Stephen Farrell wrote:

(a) The erratum I-D [1] is ready to go. Process it.


(a)

-- 
J.D. Falk
Return Path Inc
http://www.returnpath.net/
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[ietf-dkim] Consensus call on d=/i= clarification, Stephen Farrell Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus call on d=/i= clarification, Jim Fenton Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus call on d=/i= clarification, Eliot Lear Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus call on d=/i= clarification, Scott Kitterman Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus call on d=/i= clarification, Douglas Otis Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus call on d=/i= clarification, Wietse Venema Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus call on d=/i= clarification, Suresh Ramasubramanian Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus call on d=/i= clarification, Hector Santos Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus call on d=/i= clarification, J.D. Falk <= Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus call on d=/i= clarification, John Levine Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus call on d=/i= clarification, Siegel, Ellen Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus call on d=/i= clarification, Al Iverson Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus call on d=/i= clarification, Dave CROCKER Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus call on d=/i= clarification, Eliot Lear [ietf-dkim] a protocol needs a payload, Dave CROCKER Re: [ietf-dkim] a protocol needs a payload, Douglas Otis Re: [ietf-dkim] a protocol needs a payload, Hector Santos Re: [ietf-dkim] a protocol needs a payload, Jim Fenton Re: [ietf-dkim] a protocol needs a payload, Murray S. Kucherawy