On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Wietse Venema
<wietse(_at_)porcupine(_dot_)org> wrote:
Stephen Farrell:
(a) The erratum I-D [1] is ready to go. Process it.
Motivation:
Adding tweaks to a confusing document does not remove the confusion
(you can consider this my variant of Brooks's law).
Confusion is removed by stating clear terms up-front, and by casting
the discussion into those terms.
+1 for a. The confusion is minimized by Dave's draft.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html