Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus call on d=/i= clarification

ietf-dkim

2009-02-16 14:36:44

On 2/16/09 6:28 PM, Jim Fenton wrote:

(d).  My suggested changes to Eliot's proposal are at
http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim/2009q1/011153.html


+1.

Eliot
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[ietf-dkim] Consensus call on d=/i= clarification, Stephen Farrell Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus call on d=/i= clarification, Jim Fenton Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus call on d=/i= clarification, Eliot Lear <= Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus call on d=/i= clarification, Scott Kitterman Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus call on d=/i= clarification, Douglas Otis Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus call on d=/i= clarification, Wietse Venema Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus call on d=/i= clarification, Suresh Ramasubramanian Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus call on d=/i= clarification, Hector Santos Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus call on d=/i= clarification, J.D. Falk Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus call on d=/i= clarification, John Levine Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus call on d=/i= clarification, Siegel, Ellen Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus call on d=/i= clarification, Al Iverson Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus call on d=/i= clarification, Dave CROCKER

Previous by Date:	Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus call on d=/i= clarification, Jim Fenton
Next by Date:	Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus call on d=/i= clarification, Wietse Venema
Previous by Thread:	Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus call on d=/i= clarification, Jim Fenton
Next by Thread:	Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus call on d=/i= clarification, Scott Kitterman
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]