Eliot Lear wrote:
8. RFC4871 Section 2.11 Identity Assessor
...
New:
The name of the module that consumes DKIM's mandatory payload,
the
responsible Signing Domain Identifier (SDID). Other DKIM values
can also be delivered this module; however this additional
activity
is outside the scope of the DKIM signature specification.
Replace "Other DKIM values" to "Other information".
My logic: what the assessor consumes beyond the SDID is outside the
scope of the spec.
Is your concern that the presence of the DKIM qualifier could be taken to
/exclude/ other values?
The reason for saying DKIM, here, was to make sure the reader knows it's ok for
other DKIM-Sig values to be delivered. Without the DKIM reference, the
sentence
would seem to be so broad as to have truly nothing to do with DKIM.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html