On 3/25/09 10:28 PM, Dave CROCKER wrote:
Eliot Lear wrote:
8. RFC4871 Section 2.11 Identity Assessor
...
New:
The name of the module that consumes DKIM's mandatory
payload, the
responsible Signing Domain Identifier (SDID). Other DKIM
values
can also be delivered this module; however this additional
activity
is outside the scope of the DKIM signature specification.
Replace "Other DKIM values" to "Other information".
My logic: what the assessor consumes beyond the SDID is outside the
scope of the spec.
Is your concern that the presence of the DKIM qualifier could be taken
to /exclude/ other values?
Yes.
The reason for saying DKIM, here, was to make sure the reader knows
it's ok for other DKIM-Sig values to be delivered. Without the DKIM
reference, the sentence would seem to be so broad as to have truly
nothing to do with DKIM.
My concern is this: what do identity assessors use today? An IP
address. They might want that tidbid of information as well. How,
then, not to exclude it?
Eliot
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html