I found this part of Allessandro's message somewhat scary. I thought we
got past the point where l=0 was considered a viable option for anyone
to use?
Tony Hansen
On 4/24/2010 10:14 AM, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
...
A DKIM signature with an "l=" passes the DKIM module, but [...]
Some servers rewrite MIME boundaries or prologue. I'm planning to set
"l=0" for all but text/plain messages.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html