ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] list vs contributor signatures, was Wrong Discussion

2010-05-01 09:22:11
On 04/30/2010 07:09 PM, John Levine wrote:
Nope.  I'm suggesting a means for enabling DKIM authenticated mail to
survive transit through a mail list and arrive with the
intent/purpose/value of the original authentication might be for MLM's
to validate incoming mail and DKIM sign their own outbound mail along
with the appropriate A-R data.  That's all.

But you haven't offered any plausible benefit from doing so, other
than to let you mix your two mailstreams.  As I've said about a
bajillion times, we have 40 years of list management history, and this
isn't a problem that anyone has ever needed to solve.  So I'll leave
it there.

You have a very skewed view of who serves at them whim of whom.

Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html