While I personally find F2F usage sort of creepy, from the receiver's
standpoint it looks
for all intents and purposes like a mailing list, which for all intents and
purposes looks
like an unsigned piece of mail purporting to be from my domain. Intent seems to
have very
little to do with this... so maybe these all just fold into the same unsolved
case.
Any other cases of out-of-sender's control of "legitimate" mail purporting to
be from their domain?
Mike
MH Michael Hammer (5304) wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org [mailto:ietf-dkim-
bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Dave CROCKER
Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 12:49 PM
To: ietf-dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] besides mailing lists...
On 4/30/2010 9:37 AM, Jeff Macdonald wrote:
ESPs have a "forward-to-a-friend" feature for their clients. Its a
feature in which the ESPs creates the content and sends a message
from
a friend, to a friend. It would be discarded. However, I'm willing
to
say this is a bogus practice.
F2F is a well-established and helpful feature. That some uses of
receive-
side
authentication cannot cope with it is a limitation of the
authentication-
based
service, not a flaw in F2F.
d/
--
And it is easy enough to do "F2F" in a manner that does not break the
authentication-based service.
Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html