On 05/11/2010 06:10 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
From what I see on the list, there is clear consensus that this
document should be produced as a WG document (which I support as well).
So can we consider that question closed?
That's up to the chairs, but I suspect we have enough agreement to move
forward.
Agreed.
There is the incomplete matter of re-chartering though.
Right. Doing that now.
Stephen.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html