On May 19, 2010, at 7:53 AM, MH Michael Hammer (5304) wrote:
+1. The current discussion was supposed to be about BCP. I agree with
Stephen with the caveat that if the group thinks re-opening ADSP
discussion is important then include it in the re-charter. Personally
I'd like to wait until we hear some numbers about ADSP deployment and
experience.
+1
--
J.D. Falk <jdfalk(_at_)returnpath(_dot_)net>
Return Path Inc
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html