On 5/28/2010 12:07 PM, Jeff Macdonald wrote:
But I'd like to see if I understand the difference your are trying to
highlight between a manually maintained list and a self published
list.
There is a key semantic difference which, I believe, makes for a key difference
in utility.
In a manually maintained list, there is an independent assessment of what
domain
names are worth worrying about. (The independence is from the owner of the
domain. The assessment might be by a third part or it might be by the
recipient.)
The owner-based list is a statement by the domain owner, themselves, of what
domains the recipient should handle in a particular way.
An important problem with this latter model is how noisy it is. Both the
domain
owner and the transmission process introduce significant errors.
By contrast, the former model can incorporate a conformance metric into the
decision whether to list the domain.
Manually, there is confidence in understanding the
ramifications. Self published (ADSP) there is no assurance in the
understanding of the ramifications.
Right. That's true, as well as the difference in the basis for the entry.
Therefore the data collected from
one method is not applicable to the other? The end result (discarding)
would somehow end up different?
I am increasingly suspecting that ADSP's real benefit is in avoiding false
positives, rather than the false negatives as we've always discussed. This is
predicated on the importance of that "which domains should I care about?"
manual
list.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html