ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] list vs contributor signatures, was Wrong Discussion

2010-06-02 14:43:24

On May 28, 2010, at 12:14 AM, John Levine wrote:

So I understand your line of reasoning. But today, I believe ADSP can
provide a benefit. Brett has data that supports that.

Once again, we have a pernicious confusion between manually maintained
drop lists and ADSP.

Brett has data that supports the former, not the latter.

I disagree, but here's some new data that might better illustrate the case for 
ADSP.

In terms of public information, we are in production with DKIM 
verification/blocking today with two mailbox providers.  We'd like to be in 
production with say... two hundred by some near-term date certain.  Hence the 
need for ADSP.

The case is even stronger from the mailbox providers' perspective since they 
would be working with orders of magnitude more senders.



_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html