--On 14 June 2010 16:07:03 +0200 "John R. Levine" <johnl(_at_)iecc(_dot_)com>
wrote:
It's collateral to the extent that one's users complain about not getting
perfectly good mail.
My understanding of "collateral damage" is that third parties are damaged.
In an email correspondence, the sender and recipient are the first and
second parties respectively. This may or may not be damage, but it's not
collateral.
--
Ian Eiloart
IT Services, University of Sussex
01273-873148 x3148
For new support requests, see http://www.sussex.ac.uk/its/help/
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html