-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org [mailto:ietf-dkim-
bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of John R. Levine
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2010 6:23 AM
To: Ian Eiloart
Cc: DKIM List
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Lists "BCP" draft available
There's a fairly key difference you're missing here. For ADSP,
each
domain publishes what it thinks is its own policy, so if you look
at a
million domains, you have to guess about the competence of a
million
mail
system managers.
On the other hand, if you use one or two published drop lists, you
can
afford to look at them and choose ones whose administrators are
competent, without having to individually vet each entry.
Of course, I could also keep list of competent publishers of MX
records.
Indeed you could. And if the collateral damage from trying to use
inept
MX records were as bad as the damage from trying to use inept ADSP
records, you probably would.
John,
I would appreciate you describing in detail this "collateral damage". If
it involves discarding of mail from the domain in question then it is
not collateral. What else do you have for us?
Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html