-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org [mailto:ietf-dkim-
bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Daniel Black
Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 5:15 AM
To: ietf-dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Alternative MAiling List Approach
On Thursday 29 July 2010 21:21:41 Charles Lindsey wrote:
I promised to do this some while back, but only just got a round
tuit.
Ah the mythical round tuit.
I put a similar idea through when once I had a round tuit. Feel free to
follow
the threads.
http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/dkim-dev/2009-September/000202.html
This makes at least the third time this has been suggested by someone. I
believe (though I'm willing to be corrected) that the draft should therefore
cover this possibility and either advocate it or explain why it's a bad idea.
The latter is acceptable; the material is on-topic, and we're trying to relay
implementation advice and experience here, so it can be a cookbook of what to
do as well as what not to do.
Comments? And if you agree, your rationales in either direction? (I'll take
Daniel's text at that link into account.)
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html