I'm trying to get the same goal by recommending adding some non-artisicly
specified form of a "list: mlm.example" display so its more evident to the
user without percentage hacks.
I must be missing something. What does this have to do with DKIM?
If this were important, why don't MUAs look for the already standard
List-ID header, regardless of whether it's signed? In my experience,
nearly all of the mail that makes it through existing spam filters and
has a List-ID header is really from a list.
R's,
John
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html