Dave CROCKER wrote:
No doubt some do validate the From: field. Others merely mean "the
message went through my MTA". Any assertion of From: field assessment
is therefore far outside the scope of the DKIM base specification.
This is hard to grasp and conflicts with the DKIM base specification
which makes the 5322.FROM a fundamentally required binding hashed
entity in the DKIM signature manufacturing.
In additional, the 5322.From header is a historic persistent entity
from handler to handler. i.e. it can not change for any single and/or
collective set of signature.
Inherently, there are assessment assertions to be made within DKIM
5322.From binding requirement - ergo the protocol inconsistency with
between WG documents.
--
Hector Santos, CTO
http://www.santronics.com
http://santronics.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html