ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM+ADSP = FAIL, and it's our fault

2010-09-15 11:39:35


--On 14 September 2010 15:27:34 -0600 "McDowell, Brett" 
<bmcdowell(_at_)paypal-inc(_dot_)com> wrote:

...and implement what you think should work before making an issue of it
in IETF.

That's been my #1 lesson this year (I'm new to IETF).

I note that you've also returned with a non-discardable paypal email 
domain. :) So, Paypal have collectively learned that separating mailstreams 
is important (or, at least helpful) when using ADSP. It makes all the 
discussion of ADSP/MLM incompatibility moot, if you can route around it 
like that.

-- 
Ian Eiloart
IT Services, University of Sussex
01273-873148 x3148
For new support requests, see http://www.sussex.ac.uk/its/help/


_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html