ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM+ADSP = FAIL, and it's our fault

2010-09-15 11:26:17
(sorry Stephen, but I had to reply to this one)

On Sep 15, 2010, at 12:01 PM, Steve Atkins wrote:

That seems aligned with Steve's point about DKIM's value coming (only?) when 
the d= value is not the same as the domain-name in the from: field.  So 
according to you (and Steve?) the IETF should pass a normative requirement 
that all verified email be hired out to 3rd parties?!  That strikes me as 
very anti-Internet.

I think you're not reading carefully, and you're twisting Jeff's words and 
mine to a point that bears no resemblance to what either of us said.

As it turns out, you are completely correct and I withdraw that comment.  It 
just shows how entirely confused I was about what you and Jeff meant by 
3rd-party signatures (which Jeff clarified in his response).  Jeff's definition 
of 3rd-party signature is entirely different from what I thought it meant (and 
what other experts have responded to me with off-list BTW).

I've taken this conversation off-list.  
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html