-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
[mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Douglas Otis
Sent: Monday, September 27, 2010 12:00 PM
To: ietf-dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Authorizing List Domains
The ATPS draft incorrectly assumes two things:
1) All desired third-party services use DKIM.
For the purposes of the experiment, that seems to be a reasonable assumption
given the associated mechanisms. It would however be trivial to decouple it
from DKIM (or more specifically, ADSP).
2) Additional header fields are not needed to ensure proper message
sorting or recognition.
I'm open to adding such extensions to the experiment if they're deemed
necessary, but I don't want to pack the content of the record with a bunch of
stuff until that's obvious. Over-engineering these efforts up-front has been
proven a very effective way of rendering them unusable.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html