Re: [ietf-dkim] Corner cases and loose ends, was , draft-vesely-dkim-joint-sigs
2010-09-29 05:35:42
"John R. Levine" <johnl(_at_)iecc(_dot_)com> wrote:
The law requires that there be an easy to use address for unsubscribing.
The List-unsubscribe header: would do the job nicely, if the majority of
people were using mail clients that expose it by default. I don't know of
any mail client which does that.
pine/alpine does, but I agree, most MUAs don't show headers other than To,
From, Cc, and Subject.
This might be a good time to remind people that MLMs in their current form
are not broken, and any proposal that requires them to stop doing
something that they're currently doing, like rewriting messages or adding
message tags, is a non-starter.
Since nothing requires anyone do anything with respect to DKIM, I'm hard
pressed to imagine something that doesn't meet that requirement.
Scott K
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Corner cases and loose ends, was , draft-vesely-dkim-joint-sigs, (continued)
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Corner cases and loose ends, was , draft-vesely-dkim-joint-sigs, Michael Deutschmann
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Corner cases and loose ends, was , draft-vesely-dkim-joint-sigs, Ian Eiloart
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Corner cases and loose ends, was , draft-vesely-dkim-joint-sigs, Ian Eiloart
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Corner cases and loose ends, was , draft-vesely-dkim-joint-sigs, Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Corner cases and loose ends, was , draft-vesely-dkim-joint-sigs, Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Corner cases and loose ends, was , draft-vesely-dkim-joint-sigs, Ian Eiloart
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Corner cases and loose ends, was , draft-vesely-dkim-joint-sigs, Graham Murray
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Corner cases and loose ends, was , draft-vesely-dkim-joint-sigs, Steve Atkins
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Corner cases and loose ends, was , draft-vesely-dkim-joint-sigs, Ian Eiloart
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Corner cases and loose ends, was , draft-vesely-dkim-joint-sigs, John R. Levine
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Corner cases and loose ends, was , draft-vesely-dkim-joint-sigs,
Scott Kitterman <=
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Corner cases and loose ends, was , draft-vesely-dkim-joint-sigs, John Levine
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Corner cases and loose ends, was , draft-vesely-dkim-joint-sigs, Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Corner cases and loose ends, was , draft-vesely-dkim-joint-sigs, Charles Lindsey
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Corner cases and loose ends, was , draft-vesely-dkim-joint-sigs, Steve Atkins
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Corner cases and loose ends, was , draft-vesely-dkim-joint-sigs, Douglas Otis
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Corner cases and loose ends, was , draft-vesely-dkim-joint-sigs, Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Corner cases and loose ends, was , draft-vesely-dkim-joint-sigs, Michael Deutschmann
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Corner cases and loose ends, was , draft-vesely-dkim-joint-sigs, Ian Eiloart
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Corner cases and loose ends, was , draft-vesely-dkim-joint-sigs, Ian Eiloart
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Corner cases and loose ends, was , draft-vesely-dkim-joint-sigs, Douglas Otis
|
Previous by Date: |
[ietf-dkim] IGNORE list signature test, Hector Santos |
Next by Date: |
Re: [ietf-dkim] Corner cases and loose ends, was , draft-vesely-dkim-joint-sigs, John Levine |
Previous by Thread: |
Re: [ietf-dkim] Corner cases and loose ends, was , draft-vesely-dkim-joint-sigs, John R. Levine |
Next by Thread: |
Re: [ietf-dkim] Corner cases and loose ends, was , draft-vesely-dkim-joint-sigs, John Levine |
Indexes: |
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists] |
|
|