Re: [ietf-dkim] Corner cases and loose ends, was , draft-vesely-dkim-joint-sigs
2010-09-28 07:58:47
Ian Eiloart <iane(_at_)sussex(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk> writes:
Oh, but I already know that my MLM is going to break any message with a
signed body. UK law practically mandates the addition of unsubscription
information in a message footer. We certainly require it locally.
Why does it have to be in the footer when (for many MLMs) it is also in
the List-Unsubscribe: header[1]? The 'excuse' that MUAs do not display
the header details does not hold water as the MLM footer would come
after the '-- ' author's signature separator and some MUAs will not
display the signature and if the original email was multipart/alternate
does the unsubscription information have to be included in all (normally
text/plain and text/html) alternatives?
[1] Which does not break the author's DKIM signature.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Corner cases and loose ends, was , draft-vesely-dkim-joint-sigs, (continued)
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Corner cases and loose ends, was , draft-vesely-dkim-joint-sigs, Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Corner cases and loose ends, was , draft-vesely-dkim-joint-sigs, John R. Levine
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Corner cases and loose ends, was , draft-vesely-dkim-joint-sigs, Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [ietf-dkim] envelope signatures, was Corner cases and loose ends, John Levine
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Corner cases and loose ends, was , draft-vesely-dkim-joint-sigs, Michael Deutschmann
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Corner cases and loose ends, was , draft-vesely-dkim-joint-sigs, Ian Eiloart
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Corner cases and loose ends, was , draft-vesely-dkim-joint-sigs, Ian Eiloart
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Corner cases and loose ends, was , draft-vesely-dkim-joint-sigs, Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Corner cases and loose ends, was , draft-vesely-dkim-joint-sigs, Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Corner cases and loose ends, was , draft-vesely-dkim-joint-sigs, Ian Eiloart
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Corner cases and loose ends, was , draft-vesely-dkim-joint-sigs,
Graham Murray <=
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Corner cases and loose ends, was , draft-vesely-dkim-joint-sigs, Steve Atkins
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Corner cases and loose ends, was , draft-vesely-dkim-joint-sigs, Ian Eiloart
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Corner cases and loose ends, was , draft-vesely-dkim-joint-sigs, John R. Levine
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Corner cases and loose ends, was , draft-vesely-dkim-joint-sigs, Scott Kitterman
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Corner cases and loose ends, was , draft-vesely-dkim-joint-sigs, John Levine
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Corner cases and loose ends, was , draft-vesely-dkim-joint-sigs, Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Corner cases and loose ends, was , draft-vesely-dkim-joint-sigs, Charles Lindsey
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Corner cases and loose ends, was , draft-vesely-dkim-joint-sigs, Steve Atkins
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Corner cases and loose ends, was , draft-vesely-dkim-joint-sigs, Douglas Otis
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Corner cases and loose ends, was , draft-vesely-dkim-joint-sigs, Alessandro Vesely
|
Previous by Date: |
Re: [ietf-dkim] Corner cases and loose ends, was , draft-vesely-dkim-joint-sigs, Ian Eiloart |
Next by Date: |
Re: [ietf-dkim] Corner cases and loose ends, was , draft-vesely-dkim-joint-sigs, Steve Atkins |
Previous by Thread: |
Re: [ietf-dkim] Corner cases and loose ends, was , draft-vesely-dkim-joint-sigs, Ian Eiloart |
Next by Thread: |
Re: [ietf-dkim] Corner cases and loose ends, was , draft-vesely-dkim-joint-sigs, Steve Atkins |
Indexes: |
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists] |
|
|