ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Corner cases and loose ends, was , draft-vesely-dkim-joint-sigs

2010-09-28 06:43:08


--On 27 September 2010 19:26:37 +0200 Alessandro Vesely 
<vesely(_at_)tana(_dot_)it> 
wrote:


Now the MLM does its editing job.  It knows the original message was
signed, so it makes sense to verify if the signature is still good
after any changes have been applied.  In case verification fails, it
shouldn't try to distribute an adsp-breaking message, so it can either
send back a bounce or drop it.

Oh, but I already know that my MLM is going to break any message with a 
signed body. UK law practically mandates the addition of unsubscription 
information in a message footer. We certainly require it locally.



-- 
Ian Eiloart
IT Services, University of Sussex
01273-873148 x3148
For new support requests, see http://www.sussex.ac.uk/its/help/


_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>