On 4/13/2011 10:31 AM, J.D. Falk wrote:
I'm generally in favor of updating the document to match the current state of
IDN and EAI work, but I don't know it well enough to comment intelligently on
whether John's proposed text does so.
as phrased, I'll disagree with this.
one spec should not try to track fluid developments of other specs. it should
cite stable specs, and preferably ones that have gained adoption.
anything more than that is attempting to predict the future. in the case of
internationalized character issues, that's proved problematic for at least 20
years...
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html