Dave CROCKER wrote:
On 4/13/2011 10:31 AM, J.D. Falk wrote:
I'm generally in favor of updating the document to match the current state
of IDN and EAI work, but I don't know it well enough to comment
intelligently on whether John's proposed text does so.
as phrased, I'll disagree with this.
one spec should not try to track fluid developments of other specs.
it should cite stable specs, and preferably ones that have
gained adoption.
anything more than that is attempting to predict the future. in the
case of internationalized character issues, that's proved
problematic for at least 20 years...
+1.
--
HLS
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html