On Apr 13, 2011, at 12:07 PM, Dave CROCKER wrote:
On 4/13/2011 10:31 AM, J.D. Falk wrote:
I'm generally in favor of updating the document to match the current state
of IDN and EAI work, but I don't know it well enough to comment
intelligently on whether John's proposed text does so.
as phrased, I'll disagree with this.
one spec should not try to track fluid developments of other specs. it
should cite stable specs, and preferably ones that have gained adoption.
Yeah, that's a good point. If that work isn't stable yet, it may be better to
simply point to the working group.
--
J.D. Falk
the leading purveyor of industry counter-rhetoric solutions
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html