one spec should not try to track fluid developments of other specs. it
should cite stable specs, and preferably ones that have gained adoption.
Agreed. That's why I only cited 5890.
The other comments were basically saying that as far as I can tell, once
we take out the reference to 2047 (which we should do anyway), nothing
we're doing has obvious unpleasant interactions with the current state of
EAI, so even if we felt like doing something, there'd be nothing to do.
Regards,
John Levine, johnl(_at_)iecc(_dot_)com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet
for Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. http://jl.ly
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html